Magpul Industries SHOTSHOW 2008 Part 2

August 3rd, 2009 | by admin |

Magpul shows us their concept weapon the FMG-9.
Brought to you by http://www.milspecmonkey.com/

Magpul url:
http://www.magpul.com/

Duration : 0:1:39


[youtube D99NHb6B03s]

  1. 25 Responses to “Magpul Industries SHOTSHOW 2008 Part 2”

  2. By milspecmonkey on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    There was a large …
    There was a large flux of random and uninformed comment attempts, so I’m turning that feature off for now.

  3. By mysticalwoodsman on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    DAMN! … …
    ! … Considering some of the men these days, it could fit in their purse. Although I would put it in my “man-bag.” :o )

  4. By TheColdTruth on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    That is a semi auto …
    That is a semi auto. He said space is allowed for aftermarket autosear’s, which as you can see it does not have an auto sear currently (they stick out of the back on the read of the glock slide other than the original G18C).

    Also, yes, it would have to be a registered SBR.

    That said, I WANT ONE BAD.

  5. By BJagHalo on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    now, this is cool …
    now, this is cool as , but the problem with this is that it is literally a concealed weapon with just being in your hand. How easy it was to transform that flashlight into a gun was so easy.. You could carry this around and no one would know what it was. You could carry it in stores and no one would suspect. Or something similar. Of course, you’d get freaked out by something when you’re taking out the trash and pull this out, some neighbor sees you pointing it at stuff and gets on your .

  6. By neotericbladesman on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    Yeah, both the …
    Yeah, both the stock and its concealability necessitate registering it with the Feds (it’s illegal to have a gun that masquerades as something else without registering it).

    This is why we need to roll back the 1986 machine gun ban. I wouldn’t mind having something like that.

  7. By dorvinion on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    I think it would as …
    I think it would as well

    The short barrel + the shoulder stock definitely makes it a SBR rather than a pistol

  8. By waxw0rk on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    just what i need to …
    just what i need to “put out the garbage” lol..america rulez!!

  9. By zpheon on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    hey some similar to …
    hey some similar to one gun that appears in robocop 2, the one that got the kid, really cool this WPN i want one

  10. By waxw0rk on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    thats just what i …
    thats just what i need to “get my mail or walk my dog” with..lol. god bless america!!

  11. By rolat4 on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    If it goes on the …
    If it goes on the market, I would definatly buy it. I suggest that you guys do produce it and I think that it would sell well.

  12. By soundwaveCTR on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    I think it would …
    I think it would still require a tax stamp for SBR even in semi-auto format.

  13. By beatcop49 on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    That is awesome…. …
    That is awesome….I agree with Cargosquid…make it semi and sell to public.

  14. By cargosquid on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    Make is semi-auto …
    Make is semi-auto and sell it to the public.

  15. By Asasin on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    HOLY that …
    HOLY that friggin’ rules.

  16. By CottondaOwNeR on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    awsome
    awsome

  17. By KCtheKat on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    Glock in a box, …
    Glock in a box, Gotta have one!

  18. By TonyBeazley on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    nice!!!! every …
    nice!!!! every citizen should have one ….

  19. By kamizama on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    that is awesome, …
    that is awesome, and with it using standard glock parts it makes it almost maintenance free!

  20. By gtg97h on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    I can see a …
    I can see a regulatory problem or two… is this considered a pistol with a shoulder stock, or a short-barreled rifle? If it’s Class III only, getting it might be harder…

    but if I had the money, I’d get one too…

  21. By brolin1911a1 on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    Of course, it’s …
    Of course, it’s either a full automatic manufactured after the Schumer-introduced and enacted 1986 ban on registering newly manufactured machine guns or else it’s a shoulder-stocked pistol, aka short-barreled rifle. The first is completely outlawed for civilian ownership. The second requires registration with and payment of a transfer tax to BATFE along with a background check and the permission of one’s local law enforcement agencies and state of residence.

  22. By kevthebassman on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    BADASS! Time to …
    BADASS! Time to get down to BIDNESS!

  23. By luurv on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    Very impressive.
    Very impressive.

  24. By SgtRum on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    SCHWEEEET!!!

    Not …
    SCHWEEEET!!!

    Not only would I keep one in my back pocket, but I would keep one in each of my vehicles, the house, AND the garage!

    PRODUCE, PRODUCE, PRODUCE!

  25. By ForsakenOne on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    I want one!
    I want one!

  26. By waverly24 on Aug 3, 2009 | Reply

    It’s like someone …
    It’s like someone breaks into your house. You just happen to be holding the Magpul FMG-9 in your hands. The thug laughs and says “whadda you think you’re gonna do to me with that book?” After unfolding it, you wait for the thug to crap himself before spraying him with lead.

Post a Comment